Compare this focused picture of Hitler’s visage with the focused picture of the alleged victim’s visage. The blurriness and lack of definable human features should be a tip-off as to its fraudulent qualities. It is simply too blurry. Walendy (1989) has affirmed that this image is in fact a photograph of an anatomically incorrect drawing (p. 75). Compare it to the skeleton model beside it.

Note the differences between the photo of Hitler’s face and the photo of the drawing of the alleged victim’s face. There is no comparison.

ABOVE: This is another photograph of a drawing of alleged victims of the Nazis. Notice that the face, when focused upon, is extremely blurry once again. Certainly this level of atrocity against humanity would have merited a high resolution camera. Besides, the people look fake and every one of them is difficult to discern through the blur factor.

This is supposed to be a photo of a pile of shoes of alleged victims of gassings and other atrocities. Why are the shoes so difficult to discern in the background? The fact of the matter is, there were a few shoes thrown into the foreground, and the back shoes were pasted into the real photo. The background shoes are a photographed drawing. There are actually two versions of this fraudulent photo; one version has a broomstick in the foreground. Why the change? Did it look too fake?

The following distant and out-of-focus (once again) “photographs” are of alleged victims’ bodies and alleged victims’ shoes. Note what Udo Walendy (1989) has had to say about these pieces of “evidence” which served to incriminate Christians for “crimes” against the Jews.

 

Regrettably, for both Jews and Americans, they had not counted on historians like Udo Walendy and people like myself examining and posting for the public their documented lies.

 

The fact that Christians were wrongfully tried and hanged for these lies suffices as a crime against humanity.

 

Why weren’t guilty Britons, Jews, and Americans tried and hanged for these false accusations against Germans?

ABOVE: Where are this man’s genitals? Why are these images of real victims so blurry and difficult to discern? If this was to be critical evidence, it should have at least been photographed with a decent camera to prove the guilt of the alleged assailants. Furthermore, why was this photo taken so far away? Well, because it’s fake. It’s a photo of a drawing.

Apparently, the “victims” all wore glasses-frames with no lenses in them; but, more remarkably, they all wore the exact same style.

This is supposed to be a photo of “shaving brushes,” but, once again, notice how blurry and distant the “photo” is? This could pass for a pile of bodies if one were not to examine it very, very closely. But, the greatest tip-off, as to this photo’s fraudulence, is, as pointed up by Udo, the black background. The likelihood of the lighting/shading and black background is about a billion to one. Ludicrous! And the stupid and gullible Americans went for this?

 

 

Next   Back to top

Fraudulent Holocaust Photo Archive

Scanned in Work of Udo Walendy; AHRS